Powering A Nation asked experts and opinion leaders, from politicians to filmmakers to CEOs, to share their thoughts on why energy is one of the most important issues of our time.

GUEST EDITORIAL BY Senator John Kerry

More than 20 years ago, Al Gore and I helped organize the first-ever hearing in the Senate on the science of climate change. Twenty-two years later, we are still fighting to make people and policymakers feel the urgency of the issue.

Fortunately, we are not alone.

Today, America’s leadership—in the White House and in Congress—is more willing and better positioned than ever before to take action. In fact, green legislation signed by President Obama earlier this year was the kind of bold and visionary first step necessary to ward off a climate catastrophe.

The president’s package will speed up the green revolution, reordering just how we will need to power America in the near future and, in the process, create millions of green jobs to replace those lost in the current financial crisis.

The climate change and energy security bill that we will present to the Senate, building on the Waxman-Markey bill, will also jumpstart our economy, protect consumers, stop the ravages of unchecked global climate change, and ensure that America—not China or India—will be the leading economic power in this century.

Guest Editorial by THE REVEREND CANON SALLY BINGHAM, FOUNDER OF INTERFAITH POWER & LIGHT

Normally I don’t respond to questionable statements by politicians, but when Sarah Palin, in her recent article published in The Washington Post, informed her readers that “God created resources for energy right under our feet,” I had a second read and a knee-jerk response. What Palin’s article did was exemplify the vast amount of misinformation that is circulating. It is to those skeptics who lack the facts or don’t want them that I am writing.

It is true that we have been given natural resources for our use, but never has it been stated by God or anyone else that these resources are meant to be abused or to abuse others. I find it insulting to God that we blast off the tops of God’s beautiful mountains to extract coal, the dirtiest of energy sources ever provided. I find it appalling and actually wonder what Jesus would say to the idea of  encouraging roads, trucks and equipment to enter in and destroy pristine areas of the Alaska wilderness seeking oil. Jesus was a healer, not one to harm anything, even the migration path of caribou. Knowing there are alternatives to these destructive means of finding energy, are those methods moral?

GUEST EDitorial by JIM ROGERS, CEO OF DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION

We have two aspirations for our company and our nation that guide our planning and serve as a bridge to the low-carbon future we know is coming:

•    Modernize and decarbonize our generation fleet, and
•    Help make the communities we serve the most energy efficient in the world.

These aspirations are grounded in our commitment to provide our customers with affordable, reliable and clean energy, 24/7.

To achieve these aspirations, we are using a balanced approach that uses the five available fuels to generate electricity: coal, nuclear, natural gas, renewables and energy efficiency. There is no perfect fuel—each has pluses and minuses, and each one needs new technology development. But to keep energy prices affordable, our economy competitive, and to protect the environment, we must keep all five fuels in our energy mix for our nation to cross the bridge to a carbon-constrained world.

GUEST EDITORIAL BY Bill Johnson, chairman, CEO and president of Progress Energy

A casual drive through an established North Carolina neighborhood or down a former country highway presents not only a clear picture of the state’s rapid growth, but also a vivid snapshot of the dramatic changes in our energy use over the last three decades.

Since the mid-1970s, the number of homes and businesses served by Progress Energy Carolinas has doubled, and the average household’s energy consumption has increased by 46 percent. Our world has become much more aware of global climate issues and the factors that affect climate change. In the United States, we recognize the growing value of energy security, as well as fuel and technology diversity. We also know that pursuing these and other priorities will drive up energy prices in the years ahead.

These are the new energy realities that we must confront together. Policymakers, regulators and customers need to understand what’s at stake and work together on a common approach.

GUEST EDITORIAL BY Jeff Barrie, filmmaker

My concerns about energy began when I was a young boy growing up in southern California during the 1970s. At the time, Americans were forced to pay attention to the volatility of energy supplies when an oil embargo caused shortages and price spikes.

I remember riding around with my dad, looking for the gas stations with the shortest lines. We filled up an extra gas can just in case, and we put locking caps on our gas tank to prevent fuel thieves from siphoning our gasoline in the middle of the night. Few houses on our neighborhood streets put up lights during the holiday season. Energy conservation was part of our national culture.

The conservation ethic stuck with me, even as the behaviors, lifestyles and choices of the average American went in the opposite direction during the 1980s and '90s.

The prevailing attitudes seemed to say it’s cool to consume and conservation is a sign of weakness. Vice President Dick Cheney’s energy policy speech in 2001 called for a radical increase and expansion of energy production and infrastructure in America and disregarded energy conservation as nothing more than a sign of “good personal virtue.”

GUEST EDITORIAL BY Danny Orlando, ENERGY STAR Regional Program Manager

Our use of energy over the past 100 years has transformed our global economy and made our lives more comfortable and productive. We have become better at extracting energy resources and more efficient in using that energy. As a general rule, we have flourished.

But we have lost sight of the basic cyclical requirements of living on a planet. Just as though we live on a spaceship, we have to be cautious in how we use and reuse our supplies. We only have one planet, and presently we are using the resources as if there is an extra planet in the closet. I looked and it’s not there!

Nature is a strict and wonderful teacher, yet many of us are not listening or learning. In 1993, Paul Hawken wrote, “every day, the worldwide economy burns an amount of energy the planet required 10,000 days (27 years) to create.” What are we thinking?

It is imperative for our survival that we not only realize that we live on a planet, but that we start acting like we live on a planet. As with our recent economic lessons, we are quickly moving toward a potentially painful environmental lesson. 

GUEST EDITORIAL BY Robert Cox, former Sierra Club president

A confession: I did not always care about energy.

When I joined the environmental movement, I was passionate about wilderness and national forests. When friends told me they were working on “energy,” my eyes glazed over. I imagined utility commission hearings about residential electricity rates and energy-efficiency standards… boring, I thought.

In 2005, I joined thousands of environmental leaders in San Francisco for a summit on the future of environmentalism, sponsored by the Sierra Club. There, it dawned on me that everything I cared about—forests, wildlife and biodiversity, the health of communities, and more—is linked to energy. Specifically, I realized the effects on the planet’s climate of our consumption of fossil fuels—oil, coal and natural gas.

With the warming of global temperatures, coral reefs were dying, tropical diseases were migrating, scientists were warning of a sixth “Great Extinction,” severe droughts were occurring in the U.S. southwest, and other parts of the world, and more.

GUEST EDITORIAL by Rich Lechner, vice president of Energy & Environment Initiatives at IBM

For most of the last century, our electrical grids were a symbol of progress. The inexpensive, abundant power they brought changed the way the world worked–filling homes, streets, businesses, towns and cities with energy.

But today's electrical grids reflect a time when energy was cheap, their impact on the natural environment wasn't a priority, and consumers weren't even part of the equation.

Consider what we are facing today: Cities consume 75 percent of the world's energy and emit more than 80 percent of the world's carbon dioxide; nearly 400 billion kilowatt-hours are wasted each year because of insufficient power-usage information.

As a result of inefficiencies in the system, the world's creation and distribution of electric power is now incredibly wasteful. With little or no intelligence to balance loads or monitor power flows, enough electricity is lost annually to power India, Germany and Canada.

GUEST EDITORIAL BY Mort Rosenblum, journalist, author and educator

PARIS, FRANCE – About to head home to August in Arizona, I keep mulling over the 21st century human condition: Are we out of our flipping minds?

When temperatures approach 110 degrees, you can cook a frozen pizza on a car hood in a few minutes flat, and in our new climate, 110 might soon be on the cool side.

Scripps scientists tell us there is a better-than-even chance that in a few years Lake Mead will be too low to run the Hoover Dam generators that power much of Arizona.

The Colorado River is already a pathetic trickle as it passes Yuma. Serious people in nine states have trouble believing how it can be so ridiculously oversubscribed.

Mexico, deprived of the water it needs, slips further into drug violence and crime, fed partly by simple desperation.